is a call to arms for educators. It is sad, but true, in many
cases the emphasis on content and testing has taken up class time that could be
used for educational creative pursuits. He challenges us to give creativity the
same status as literacy and accuses us of squandering the talents of children.
This seems apparent when you compare elementary science students to secondary
science students. The younger ones love science and cannot wait for labs.
Somewhere between fifth and tenth grade something breaks and many students no
longer find joy in science. The courses do become more specific and detailed
and less about creating and exploring. The use of technology, including web
tools and digital media, can give students the opportunity to find enjoyment in
the coursework again. Educators will to take a risk, plan and be patient can
save creativity from disappearing.

I have spent last three years working towards a more individual,
engaging and yes, creative atmosphere in my physics and scientific research and
design (SRD) classes. By flipping both classes, removing lecture from the
classroom and making class time work time, I have been given time to add
creative activities back into the curriculum. Both classes are science but SRD
is an elective and primarily process while physics is required and content
heavy.
Even with a great deal of content to cover, physics students
have time to create. English Language Learners have been more successful
showing me what they have learned in a video or Google presentation than they are
on multiple choice tests. Students have used video, instead of pen and paper to
submit a lab report. The results have been pleasing, better physics, better
learning and real proof of understanding.
 |
Flour Sack by Andrew E. |
The most significant changes have happened in SRD. The SRD
curriculum is primarily the use of scientific process with the application and
extension of prior knowledge. At the end
of a unit on forces of flight, the assessment was to “show me what you learned”.
One student who is very creative used the labs and lessons to study how things
move when they are in the air. The result was an
animated video of a flying flour sack. It
perfectly showed what he had learned and how he had created meaning in the
learning. Students are currently
completing a unit on conservation of energy and are creating lab reports in the
form of
movie trailers. They have created comic heroes using
Scholastic Comic Maker
to show what they understand about physics concepts, build mobiles to explore
torque and build roller coasters to examine conservation of energy. I have been impressed with how students go above and
beyond to create a wonderful product.
 |
Movie Trailer |
This year I have made the biggest leap using techniques and
tools I have learned about in my course work. I have also had the luxury of
working with students who have embraced the course and always surprise me with
their products. Even if the situation was different or more difficult, I would
be trying to give students the opportunity to create. As teachers we need to be
willing to try and incorporate opportunities for creativity in our classes. We
must be take the risk and stretch beyond what we are familiar with in order to
better prepare students for a world with jobs that we cannot even imagine.
Robinson, S. K. (2006, February). How Schools Kill
Creativity. Retrieved May 26, 2014, from TED Talks:
http://www.ted.com/talks/ken_robinson_says_schools_kill_creativity#t-539246
E, Andrew. (2014) Flour Sack. Retrieved May 28, 2014 from https://vimeo.com/96846307