In the earliest days of flipping my classroom, the
technology and content resources were limited compared to current offerings. My
colleague and I flipped on-level physics based on the model introduced by the
AP chemistry teacher. One of the most important part of our success, besides
the strong stubborn streak and an element of crazy, was the support of our
administrators. They understood how important it was to let us try something
that might move us away from the traditional class model to a more active
student-centered class. Because this was early in the world of educational
technology, there were lots of problems popping up every day. The principals
would see me heading their way and say, “run here comes Katie with the problem
of the day”. Problem of the day morphed into speed bump because they were so
very frequent, mostly small, and conquerable with thought and care.
Fast forward to the present. I am starting to plan flipping
a college physics course in the spring semester. This will be my first college teaching
since I was a teaching assistant many years ago. I can’t imagine me delivering
a lecture physics course, so of course I’m planning to flip. It is a whole new
adventure in flipping with a new set of unknown problems, logistical and
instructional. I am not sure when I will find out which level of physics I will
be teaching, so actual preparation for content will have to wait. Now I am
contemplating the nuts and bolts and the framework for best practices and
optimized learning at the college level.
Communication about the class and why it is flipped will be
directly aimed at the students. I will not have to convince parents and already
have administration approval. Students wanting a traditional lecture will be
disappointed and I hope they will not choose to drop. I will need a way to
convince them to give it a try, even if they have had a bad experience in the
past.
Filling class time with quality learning experiences was challenging
work in high school physics, but I had lots of equipment, toys, and supplies at
my fingertips when I needed to adjust during class. This will not be true at
the college. I am only teaching one section, so the supplies, equipment, and
props will have to be portable and well planned. Also, the room could be a room
with tables or desks or a lecture hall with fixed seats, so I am looking at a
method that works in lecture halls as well as classrooms, team based learning.
Heading into spring, I really do not know what to expect.
Fortunately, I know physics, I have the technology and skills to create active,
blended lessons, and I enjoy the challenge of trying something new. Bring on
the speed bumps, I am ready, I think.
Go Katie Go!
ReplyDeleteThank you Scott!
DeleteYou're at least the 3rd public school flipper I know who has transitioned to a college-level position (with Matthew Moore and Mickie Gibbs). I'm sure you will also make it work really well! The different frequency and length of class sessions is an interesting 'speed bump' of its own, but might bring some advantages too!
ReplyDeleteI am a little anxious about what level I will be teaching and the pacing of the material. Thank you for your encouraging words!
Delete